Learn about the foundations of Pentecostalism and discover George Fox of the Shakers/Quakers, one of the early pioneers of “extra-Biblical” revelation and authority which led to the charismatic cultic beliefs and practices of modern day. Continue reading
For those unfamiliar with Pentecostalism, it is not a denomination but was considered a “movement” back in the early 20th century which sprouted into several main denominations: Christian and Missionary Alliance, Assemblies of God, International Church of the Foursquare Gospel, … Continue reading
A short while ago I was caught up in a whirlwind discussion with a minion of a false teacher named Rob Bell. I would have to say that Bell has pretty much run the gamut of waxing and waning in … Continue reading
I am a former Charismatic and I spent 4 years at a church that was part of the Word-Faith Charismatic cult a la Benny Hinn and then drifted from Word Faith to New Apostolic Reformation Charismatic cultism. We would have … Continue reading
It is quite rational to embrace and defend the existence of the “miraculous”. The very existence of God Himself is supernatural, i.e. ‘above’ or ‘outside’ the natural. This would limit the number of those who deny the existence of miracles to only the most staunch of atheists. Agnostics and liberal “Christians” would be forced to deny the existence of a ‘miraculous’ God in order to deny the existence of miracles themselves. It is quite reasonable to assume that a God who is himself a miracle and a “wonder” would by His very manner and nature, engage in miraculous or “supernatural” behavior. This is rational when the examination of miracles really involves a proper definition whereby one law supersedes another, namely the law of God-like behaviour outranks the law of natural behaviour. An example of this would be enabling the buoyancy of a human and the supporting buoyancy of water to permit that human to balance upright and engage in motion atop the water level . i.e. to “walk” on water.
Atheists like to use the phrase, “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence”. This phrase seems to suit the atheist well when he is the one defining what “extraordinary” is. But if a theist was to assert that the atheist’s proposition that in all the universe on all the planets among all things and beings seen and unseen that there was nothing among all of them that was or could be categorized as “god” – was an even more extraordinary claim than the theist claiming that God did exist, then the burden of proof could be placed on the atheist to provide “extraordinary evidence” that a God does not exist. This flawed argument of claim vs evidence is used to discount the existence of miracles and the ‘super’ natural altogether when in reality it is just a matter of defining “extraordinary” which in the case of miracles is as ordinary as many of the claims of the skeptic.
There is more than a distinct possibility, rather a strong probability that God has communicated with mankind (male and female). Within each of us is an overwhelming passion to know and embrace a deity of some sort. For the Hindu, it may be 1 of 30 million gods and goddesses, for the Muslim it may be the god, Allah, invented by Mohammad, or for the Buddhist, they may disobey Siddhartha Gauthama (The Buddha) himself and offer worship to him, or for the Christian it is the God of the Bible, the God of all creation Jesus Christ. Even within atheists there is such rabid emotions of anger and frustration attached to their notion that “God is just a Santa Claus” that within them is an attachment to the constant nagging notion that God actually exists! Otherwise why be so angry about a bunch of people believing in a Santa Claus!? Do they ridicule their own or other children to be opposed to a belief in the existence of Santa Claus? Of course not! In fact, they often times embrace this belief in the lives of their kids. But they cannot fathom or stomach the idea that someone else holds fast to the correct belief in the existence of a Creator-God. This they try to stamp out. There is constant communication with all men through creation and through their own conscience that He, God, exists.
So for the animist, some Buddhists, the Muslim, the Jew, and the Hindu, these all have the same communication resulting in a drive, albeit wrongly placed, to know and embrace deity in some way, shape, or form which shows that within each man is a built-in device pulling and drawing them to know God Almighty. For the Bible-believing Christian, we adhere to the reliability, sufficiency, and inspiration of the Scriptures which provides constant and direct communication to all of God’s creation. First, to the unbeliever, that we are all desperately lost in disobedience, defiance, and deception toward the God of the Bible and opt instead for the delusion that He does not exist OR for a god of our own mind because we simply find Him…unacceptable. This rejection of the King of Glory ultimately results in the eternal separation from Him – which is nothing more than our heart’s wish for our entire lives. This separation is the absolute and complete removal of any and all things that have anything whatsoever to do with God Himself: all things good – comfort, satisfaction, peace, rest – all lost forever as they are/were products of Him! This eternal separation is communicated to us in the Bible as Hell. God the Father sent His Son to die for this disobedience, defiance, and deception of ours so that as John 1:12 says, “For as many as believed Him (Jesus) to them He gave the right to be called sons and daughters of God, to those who trust in His (Jesus) name” So we see that God communicates the solution for the unbeliever.
For the beliver God communicates that His word – The Scriptures – The Bible is sufficient and “necessary for doctrine (correct doctrine), reproof, correction, and training in righteousness that the man of God may be complete for every good work”. Believers do not need the mysticism of the Hindus where there are visions and whispering guiding us around by our nose into greater deception, we do not need the myriad of constant man-made hierarchy supposedly acting as “intercessors” between us and Almighty God – like the Roman Catholics do. We do not need to pray 5 times toward Mecca, go on mandatory pilgrimmages, or execute “infidels” in a jihad, as the Muslims do. We don’t need to work our way to God Almighty – He has, through His Son Jesus completed the work so that you and I can have eternal life and joy in Him if we are honest about our sin, humble in crying out, and repenting of our former dead fleshly behavior clinging to His finished work on the cross for our sake we can KNOW that we have eternal life in Him. Why? Because He HAS communicated it in His word and through His Word.
An astounding number of likenesses exist between two very unlikely spiritual bedfellows: Islam and Mormonism. I thought I had stumbled on to these similarities myself and was all ready to plant a flag for my discovery when, after minimal research, … Continue reading
I’ve been dialoguing with friends recently about the myriad world religions, sects, and denominations that comprise these religions and it fueled the question: Why are Sunni and Shi’ite Muslims called “sects” while Methodists and Lutheran Christians are called “denominations”? And … Continue reading
A world view is the foundational belief system upon which one’s entire understanding of the “big picture” of all existence, and the more immediate “small picture” one’s personal existence, is based. A. It is the answer to “why” things happen, … Continue reading
I have developed a flow chart or “family tree” of Christian denominations based on historic schisms or “branches” due to theological disagreements – primarily in the areas of sanctification (how a person attains holiness and Christian maturity once they are born again), liturgy (i.e. the sacraments) and/or pneumatology (i.e. operation of the gifts), reformation, or geo-political relocation.
Overall there are 7 “families” of denominations within the Christian church: In chronological order of appearance they are – Oriental Orthodox (Nestorian), Orthodox, Roman Catholic (differentiated at time of Great Schism), Pre-Reformers (Waldensians, Moravians, and Unity of the Brethren), Lutheran, Anglican, and Reformed Churches. The latter three are all as a result of the Great Reformation.
• 1. Oriental Orthodox – Earliest of schisms primarily around the Christology of Nestorius and questioned authority of the Ecumenical Councils 4-7. This church still exists today and is under heavy Muslim persecution in North Africa and the Middle East.
• 2. Orthodox – Eastern Byzantine empire – primarily represented by Greek, Serbian, and Russian Orthodox churches. The Eastern Orthodox church formed over the course of about 800 years and culminated in the disagreement over the filioque clause of the Nicene Creed. This led to a mutual excommunication of Western Pope and Eastern Archbishop in 1054 AD and has become known to us as the “Great Schism”. The Russian and eventually Serbian Orthodox churches can be traced to the work of two missionaries named Cyril and Methodius in the 9th-10th century. They were sent out by the Eastern church (already in existence prior to the Great Schism) and shared the gospel with the slavic people even taking the Slavic language and creating a written form for them (Cyrillic Alphabet)
• 3. Roman Catholic Church – Was more “differentiated” than “founded” per se as a result of the theology of Augustine and later Thomas Aquinas. The first person to claim the title of “Pope” in the sense of a supreme pontiff was actually claimed by Leo the Great in the 5th century. This was to the chagrin of much of the existing church at the time, primarily in the east as he was just an archbishop of Rome at the time but then argued at the ecumenical council of his day for the preeminence of the Roman See – thereby making him the preeminent “pontiff”. In later centuries, this self-appointment was contended which resulted in the conspicuous doctrine of Peter being the first archbishop of Rome and therefore Peter being the first pope and founder of the “true” church. Later, in 600AD a pope by the name of Gregory (Gregory the Great) would give the world a glimpse of the church affecting state as he began to either directly or indirectly appoint leaders of western nations. Ultimately, the overstepping of power, self-assumed pre-eminence, and eventual changing of the Nicene Creed by the addition of the filioque would result in the Great Schism whereby the Roman Catholic church would emerge as a differentiated church body from that of the Eastern Orthodox church in 1054 AD.
• 4. Pre-Reformers: Unity of the Brethren or “Moravian” church- began by secret small study groups formed by John Hus who took up the cause of John Wycliffe in the UK, calling for the preaching of the word to people in their spoken language (not in Latin), Scriptures written in the common tongue (not Latin), and the disbursement of horded wealth by the Roman Catholic monasteries. Wycliffe was persecuted but protected in his lifetime but Hus was not so fortunate. He was burned at the stake for speaking against the Catholic church and his followers were disbursed – Half of which left to join the Moravians – the other half formed the “Unity of the Brethren” church – both groups are still in existence today.
• 5. Lutheran – started by Martin Luther and although some Lutheran pastors have left to join or start other movements, there have been no significant denominations that trace their roots to Lutherans aside from the Lutheran Missouri Synod. This is to the Lutherans credit.
• 6. Anglican – The result of King Henry VIII’s desire for an heir. He desired to divorce Catherine of Aragon and marry Anne Boleyn to produce an heir. The Pope refused this as he owed his position to the parents of Catherine of Aragon. Henry VIII seceded from the Church at large and a slow process of reformation would ensue for Great Britain thereafter. Most denominations trace their roots to this branch: Baptists, Methodists, Pentecostals, etc.
• 7. Reformed – Founded liturgically by Ulrich Zwingli in Zurich, Switzerland and then later, theologically by the French refugee Jean Calvin in Geneva, Switzerland. Calvin’s five points – Total Depravity, Unconditional Election, Limited Atonement, Irresistible Grace, and Perseverance of the Saints are usually shared universally across all denominations that hail from the Reformed Church beginning. A large number of denominations consider the Reformed church as their historical foundation: Presbyterians, Amish, Evangelical Free, and Christian and Missionary Alliance (CM and A)
On the chart, I have colored each family separately to differentiate the direct and indirect relationships they bear to one another. Upon closer investigation of this chart, you will discover that the greatest contributor to the list of denominations is the Anglican church, followed by the Reformed family of denominations.
The denominational flow chart is chronological from top down and works much like a family tree with the origin or “roots” of a denomination shown by a vertical line and a similarity or “sibling kinship” to another denomination drawn by a horizontal line. the top or beginning of the tree can be dated 30 A.D. and the bottom or last major denomination formed can be dated 1993 (International Church of Christ, formerly known as the Boston Church of Christ)
Much of this research has been compiled from the books “History of The Christian Church” by Philipp Schaff, “Church History In Plain Language” by Bruce Shelley, Frank Mead’s “Handbook of Denominations”, and to a lesser extent, Max Anders’ “30 Days to Understanding Church History” along with the historical information provided by a particular denomination’s official website.
To explore a more in-depth description of the history, reasons for, and origins of schisms and splits of the denominations below, feel free to visit our Christian Denominations page.